Do you want to know how choosing building products is done? Is it just a matter of putting all things together to make it sturdy? Every building product has to undergo tests to make sure that they are reliable for building projects. And thus, there has to be an evaluation to regulate them.
When you are building a house or a commercial building, the first thing that must be on your mind is the safety of the people who will be working or living there. product evaluation The building must withstand harsh climates, and could survive an earthquake or fire. After the blue print is made, it is time to implement the project. But you need high standard materials to make a strong and secure building. That is when the evaluation panel comes in.
A building products evaluation is made by a building organization that helps in checking the quality of products and to regulate these in the market. Some companies just label the paint cans and woods as safe so that they will attract more customers. But if these products are of low quality, dangers could arise such as health respiratory diseases, and the wall and ceiling breaking and shattering that could end in catastrophes. Would you like to live in a house that will crumble during an earthquake? Or course not. That is why rules have to be made and set.
The evaluation is made when new products are arising. These products have to undergo tests such as weather tests, temperature tests, fire resistant tests and shock proof tests. The results will be recorded by a laboratory professional. After all the results are taken, it will be given to an evaluation panel. They will determine if the product passed the building products evaluation and will be given a safe certification.
Before you work on a new house or building project, make sure that the products to be used are all approved by the building products evaluation panel.
Are you looking for more information regarding building products evaluation
I’ve just read a great article «Evaluating vendors? Kill the spreadsheets » by Alan Pelz-Sharpe from Intelligent-Enterprise.
So what’s he talking about?
Well, decision makers and IT procurers usually follow a standard process for buying software:
1 – They establish the specification required and construct the famous “table of evaluation.” This is usually a Excel file with several sheets and hundreds of questions (if not thousands), most of which are closed and very precise.
2 – They send the list of questions to a selection of developers (often just the famous ones that come to mind straightaway).
3 – The software is scored against the technical requirements and the top couple of applications tested before purchase.
So, what’s wrong with that?
1st pitfall: many questions leave room for vendor subjectivity
Lots of answers are very difficult to verify and so liberal interpretations are only discovered after the software has been installed. Furthermore Alan Pelz-Sharpe reports that vendors will often out right lie, skewing the results towards the less ethical developer. This leaves the honest and rigorous providers at the bottom of the pile, even when their software might actually be the most apt.